Built for the work behind compliance
Find gaps, drive remediation, and keep controls, policies, evidence, and reporting connected. Give your team a clear path to compliance and the structure to maintain it.
75%Less audit complexity. A shorter timeline.MCG Global customer resultPurpose-built for CMMC and NIST SP 800-171.
Flexible enough for your next framework.
IA.L2-3.5.3 · Alex Chen
AC.L2-3.1.12 · Sarah Miller
IR.L2-3.6.3 · David Vance
Connected records
Implementation notes, policy versions, and supporting files stay linked to the requirement.
Record ownership and review status against each requirement.
| Requirement | Owner | Review status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| AC.L2-3.1.1Limit system access to authorized users | Sarah Miller | Complete | 4 linked records |
| IA.L2-3.5.3Use multifactor authentication | Alex Chen | Infosec action | 2 linked records |
| IR.L2-3.6.3Test incident response capability | David Vance | Not started | 0 linked records |
Preview only. Changes stay in this page and reset when you reload.
Keep risk, ownership, due dates, and progress with the requirement.
| Remediation task | Risk | Owner | Due | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enforce MFA for privileged accountsIA.L2-3.5.3 · Identity & authentication | High | Alex Chen | Nov 06 | In progress |
| Review remote access policyAC.L2-3.1.12 · Access control | Medium | Sarah Miller | Nov 12 | In review |
| Attach incident response exercise resultsIR.L2-3.6.3 · Incident response | Medium | David Vance | Nov 18 | Not started |
Showing 3 sample tasks.
Adapt templates to your organization, then assign owners and reviewers.
Sample policy record
Define how access is requested, approved, reviewed, and removed. Adapt the template to the systems and responsibilities in your organization.
Illustrative record, not a complete policy document.
Track owners, review states, expiry, and links to assessment objectives.
| Evidence record | Control association | Owner | Review state |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quarterly access reviewReview record · Q3 | AC.L2-3.1.1 | Sarah Miller | Approved |
| MFA enrollment reportProvider observation · Microsoft 365 | IA.L2-3.5.3 | Alex Chen | In review |
| Incident response exerciseExercise report · Prior year | IR.L2-3.6.3 | David Vance | Expired |
Upload once, link to the objectives it supports, and keep the review history together.
Customer-reported result · MCG Global
Cut audit complexity and timeline by 75%.
Reported by MCG Global in an existing CyberComply customer engagement. Individual results depend on scope and starting point.Built around your responsibilities
Give your team a structured way to define the CUI boundary, resolve gaps, and produce an SSP grounded in implementation records.
Explore CMMC coverageGive a small team a starting point for policies, clear ownership, and a place to collect the records needed for customer security reviews.
See the platformOrganize multiple projects and framework assessments while keeping responsibility and supporting records visible to the people doing the work.
Explore cross-mappingManage separate tenant and project workspaces with the access each engagement needs. Keep client records organized as your practice grows.
See the platformConnect controls, evidence, and remediation so reviewers can see what is implemented, what is missing, and where the next action belongs.
Explore AI workflowsUse recorded progress, review status, and assigned remediation to focus discussions on the work and decisions that move the program forward.
Explore the workspaceThe platform
Give every requirement a clear next step. Keep ownership, documentation, and evidence connected so your team can focus on closing gaps.
Stop losing gaps between assessment and follow-up. Assign an owner, set a due date, and track risk and progress against the objective, with records to support POA&M planning.
Explore remediationSave the first drafting pass with 25 policy templates. Adapt them to your organization, route them to owners and reviewers, and keep versions linked to the controls they support.
Explore policiesGive reviewers the file and its context in one place. Link evidence to objectives, track approval and expiration, and see which records need attention before the review.
Explore evidenceTurn the scope, implementation statements, policies, and evidence you already maintain into an SSP. Review the result and export PDF or Word without rebuilding the document by hand.
SSP · Compliance reports · Evidence exportsGive the team a shared view of systems, CUI assets, locations, and interconnections. Capture CAGE/UEI details and FIPS 199 categorization so assessment work starts with a defined boundary.
System inventory · CSV import & exportSee who owns each objective, what is implemented, and what is ready for review. Keep feedback with the requirement and use supported CMMC SPRS scoring to inform gap discussions.
Explore controlsCollect responses through published questionnaires and guest access, with due dates and completion status in one place.
Organize separate tenants and projects with the right access for client teams, control owners, and auditors.
Find overlap and review eligible implementation reuse so the next assessment builds on what your team has already documented.
Explore control cross-mappingIntegrations
Bring read-only provider observations into your assessment workflow. Link checks to objectives, keep evidence current through collection runs, and focus on the findings that need attention.
Find configuration gaps across IAM, logging, and storage encryption with repeatable security checks.
Commercial & AWS GovCloud
Bring identity and audit posture into view with checks for MFA, Conditional Access, roles, and logging.
Commercial & GCC High
See where users and administrators still need two-step verification enrollment or enforcement.
Google Admin SDK
Review repository safeguards through checks for branch protection, reviews, and security alerts.
Repository security checks
Microsoft Azure is listed on the integration roadmap. An Azure collector is not available yet.
MCP & ChatGPT workflows
Ask where evidence is missing, draft implementation narratives from recorded facts, and plan remediation with the project’s requirements in view.
Configure a custom GPT with CyberComply’s OpenAPI Actions to query requirements, review evidence records, and work through implementation questions.
“Which requirements still need supporting evidence?”
Connect your instance and API credentials in the Action configuration.Use the local stdio MCP server with compatible clients such as Claude Desktop and Cursor. Retrieve project context and draft narratives from recorded facts.
“Draft this implementation narrative and identify missing facts.”
MCP starts read-only. Write tools require explicit configuration.Use AI to help inspect gaps and prepare updates. Review changes against the actual scope, evidence, and permissions before they become part of your compliance record.
“Help me plan the remediation for these open gaps.”
API access follows the connected user’s tenant and project permissions.Control cross-mapping
A new framework shouldn’t mean rewriting everything. Find overlapping requirements, review what can be reused, and focus your team on the obligations that still need work.
Explore relationships between CMMC, SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA controls, with source references and relationship detail.
Preview implementation text and supporting evidence context against the target requirement.
Apply eligible reuse with a recorded decision. Turn remaining gaps into assigned remediation tasks.
508 mapping candidates across four frameworks.
Target requirements and evidence suitability remain part of the review.
Implementation narrative · Owner · Supporting evidence
Keep shared implementation context, document target-specific differences, and record the reuse decision.
Framework coverage
Add a framework project when obligations grow. Keep its requirements and evidence together, then use cross-mapping to review where your existing implementation can help.
Level 1 and Level 2 workflows with system scoping, objective-level implementation, remediation, SSP reporting, and supported SPRS scoring.
Catalog versions vary by framework. Select the version that matches your assessment; framework coverage does not imply certification.
Shared work, clear responsibility
See progress, outstanding work, and the records behind each requirement.
Update implementation details, attach evidence, and work through assigned remediation.
Review implementation and evidence, leave feedback, and follow findings through resolution.
Organize work across separate tenants and projects with the appropriate access for each team.
Simple pricing
Choose the setup that works for your team. Talk with us about your requirements and get a quote.
Discuss your compliance goals, deployment preferences, and pricing.
Book a call with our sales team A 30-minute conversation with CyberComply.A few practical questions
No. Your team manages controls, policies, evidence, remediation, and reports in the web application. The REST API and MCP server are optional interfaces for technical workflows.
The library includes 25 starting templates, including access control, incident response, business continuity, encryption, remote access, and vendor management. Adapt them to your organization, assign owners and reviewers, and maintain project policy versions.
Tasks can be linked to a project or assessment objective and record risk, ownership, status, due dates, resources, and effort. These records support remediation planning and SSP reporting. Your team reviews which gaps belong in a POA&M and any assessment-specific eligibility requirements.
The provider collectors perform read-only checks. Findings help your team identify what needs attention; configuration changes happen through your own administration and remediation processes.
No. CyberComply organizes your implementation records and supporting evidence. Your organization remains responsible for implementing requirements, validating documentation, and preparing for the assessment. The assessor determines the outcome.
No. This page uses fictional sample data to demonstrate navigation and selected workflows. Changes in the preview stay in your current page and are discarded when you reload. No email address or account credentials are collected here.
Put the work in one place
Book a 30-minute demo to see how CyberComply can support your compliance program.
